Flight with a child in the lap can be dangerous – here’s what experts suggest instead: ‘people don’t understand the danger’

Reduce the crash of a Delta Air Line Flight in Toronto last week brought out the potential flight risks with a young child sitting in the adult lap.

The aircraft crashed, which would make the keeping over an extremely difficult child.

Authorities did not say if the 18 -month -old child was injured in a collision was riding the parent’s lap. All 21 people who were injured were released from the hospital, but young children died in previous clashes.

Despite the latest rash of aviation catastrophes, the airline collisions remain rare, but children can easily be injured if they are in the parents’ lap when a plane meets turbulence.

Experts agree that it is safer for children younger than 2 years old to have their own plane and ride in approved car seats when flying, even if families have to pay for an additional ticket. But babies are still allowed to travel in laps, so parents continue to do it despite the risks.

“The saddest part is that most families traveling with a child in the laps think because it is allowed is safe,” said former flight companion Jan Brown, who had to look at a mother in the face after she had just lost 22-month- The old boy when their plane crashed and went into some parts near Sioux City, Iowa, in 1989.

Brown stopped that mother from climbing back to the debris of the united flight 232 after he came to rest in a corn field.

“I told her that I thought she would stop him: that the rescue workers would find it. And she just came to me and said, ‘You told me to put my baby on the floor. And I did. And he is gone . And so I think it was the moment I became a child’s lawyer, ”Brown said.

Of the four laps on that plane, three were injured and the woman’s son was among the 112 people who died.

A 6 -month -old boy traveling to the parent’s lap was killed in 2012 when a plane landed tightly and exceeded the bottom of a track in Nunavut, Canada. Last year, three babies in the laps could have been absorbed by a Alaska Airlines plane after a door plug flew out of average, but none was sitting near the opening to happen.

What do experts recommend?

The National Transport Safety Board and its counterpart in Canada, the Transport Safety Board, have long recommended that young children fly to approved car locations to protect them. The Federal Aviation Administration also recommends using car seats, but does not require it despite lobbying by lawyers.

In addition to those security regulators, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the largest airline groups and trade unions support they require young children to fly to approved car locations.

The main case investigators in the United States and Canada began to recommend children’s car seats under 2 years of age and specialized restriction systems for older children until they are longer than 40 inches (102 centimeters) after deadly clashes in the country their.

“We have all been there at that point of your life when you have young children. You are not swimming in cash. You are trying to save nickel and know in any way you can. And if you can avoid buying a Additional place, is a fully understandable reaction, ”said NTSB member Tom Chapman. “It is just that people do not understand the danger they are subject to their child by not buying that place and limiting them properly.”

Not only is it safer for children to board their places, but it is more pleasant for parents who do not have to keep a child clash for hours in the air.

Car seat expert and mother Michelle Pratt, who founded Safe in the country, said no matter how tempting it is to check that children’s box, families should all get one ticket.

“Your baby may come less than your controlled suitcase. Why not get a counselor? “Pratt said.

What do parents think?

Some parents like Clare Rumning are not convincing. After landing in Burbank, California, with her husband and her child 5 months on Thursday, she said she does not see a car seat on the plane.

“I really don’t see them different, personal,” said Ronning, who has already taken her daughter in six flights. “It just looks like another money catch.”

But Mredith Tobitsch never imagined the flightless flight for her 3-year-old daughter and would not do it with her 14-year-old now, or because of security and practical worries.

“If there were riots, your natural reflex would be to leave your children,” said Tobitsch, who lives in Connecticut, adding that her older daughter always slept better in her car seat, making flights much more enjoyable.

“Of course, this increases the cost of air travel for families, but it’s a security thing. At least we, we’re lucky to do it,” she said.

Why not required?

FAA relics in a study done in the 1990s to justify that families do not ask families to buy tickets for children younger than 2.

The reasoning is that if families had to buy those extra tickets, more of them could drive instead of flight. Because driving is dangerous than flight, this would mean that more children would die in a car collision than they would be stored on the plane if car seats and separate tickets were required.

Chapman with NTSB thinks logic is an extension and the study should be reviewed, especially as the airline tickets are more affordable today.

But parent Andrea Ardondo suggested that there may be some truth to her, saying she could fly less if she had to buy a ticket and fall along a car place for her 4-month-old when flying with family its and the two oldest children.

“I would be more likely to land our plane through seats,” the furniture said, explaining that she and her husband already have their hands traveling full with three children, three car seats they control, a itinerant and the game group.