If you are offered a drink during a job interview, Water supply Will you do?
Employees have discovered secret intake tests that managers use to determine if a candidate is suitable for the job – and they include methods such as the “Water” test.
In a reappeared thread Reddit, a user asked employment managers to discover the “special tests” that the interviewees put through “without knowing”, a question that gave hundreds of answers.
One respondent said their employment manager uses a “water” test, in which “they put a container of water with a cup to see if someone will drink it while being interviewed.”
“I was the only person who drank water their questions.
“Apparently, you can tell a lot about a person from the way they refuse the water offer or drinking it too quickly.”
Readers could not believe that the method was used to determine the candidacy for a job, with some saying that their intestinal instinct would be to refuse to drink from the right to leave a lipstick or should use the bathroom.
“Lipstick stains are embarrassing, and most interviews are 30-60 minutes, I wouldn’t get extremely thirsty, and what if you make me need to peel?” Write a person. “Also, I can keep my voice completely calm and pleasant even when I’m completely leaving in my head, but my hands can sometimes have a little tremor. No good circumstances to drink water!”
“I would hate this … I always drink quickly, it would be easily misinterpreted,” another was pleaded.
“This is an incredible way of getting a way of folly to find employees,” someone else led.
Other ways that hire managers secretly tested job candidates, including lunch and observing how quickly they chose a menu article or how enthusiastic were about their hobbies.
“Not me, but my grandfather. He started a very successful business for himself and he said that whenever he costs by hiring someone, he takes them for lunch,” one person wrote. “If they take more than minute or two to choose something from the menu, he won’t hire them.”
“I would ask about hobbies and then ask an uninformed question (but hope not to insult) about their hobbies, even if he was the one in myelf,” said another user.
“The goal was to see that they respond. Some people would make me feel stupid because I didn’t know something they knew. Most would respond polytely and probably explain one or two things. Really good would treat me as one of 10,000 lucky and actually tease me for their hobbies. “
A former restaurant worker recalled how his boss would redirect the search applicants to enter the kitchen door at the back of the dinner than at the front entrance.
“As they were strolling through the building, he would pull into the kitchen and put a broom on the floor, just inside the door,” the user said.
“If the app entered through the rear door normally, he or she was given a request to complete and then sent. But if the app entered through the rear doorâ and catches the broom to stand it with other broomshe or she was hired on the spot. “
Arbitrary judgments are similar to those of the controversial “brown test” used by a manager who would provide applicants a mug in the office kitchen before sitting for interview.
Once they were done, if the future employee did not offer to return their used cup into the kitchen, they were unlikely to be employed.
#Discover #Water #Test #Covert #Work #Interviews #break #chances #work
Image Source : nypost.com